HOW TO AVOID UNCOLLECTIBLES
ON INTERNATIONAL CREDIT SALES
By Romelio Hernandez, HMH Legal
DISCLAIMER: The information you obtain in this article is not, nor is it intended to be legal advice. Our Law Office [HMH Legal] will only provide legal advice after having entered into an attorney client relationship. It is imperative that any action you take be done on the advice of counsel, and not based solely upon this article.
Securing payment out of a credit sale heading into Mexico takes more than running a credit report for your prospective customer and making sure he is “creditworthy”. In order for us to have the best possibilities of collecting on an overdue account, we have to make sure that our sale is conducted in a way that anticipates legal action should our debtor fail to honor his payment commitment.
From a litigation standpoint, it is not only necessary to have sufficient proof of your sale; it is crucial that we have the kind of evidence and tools that will allow us for a cheaper, faster and more secure remedy.
The following article will try to provide and explain therefore, a game plan that exporters should follow when selling goods into Mexico on credit, in order to guarantee the most favorable scenario should legal action be required for collection.
Practical advice will be given in summary fashion on the recommended legal remedies available, as well as the essential documents, information and security devices that will give way to these remedies. We will also asses the possibility of substituting litigation in Mexico for arbitration or court proceedings overseas, according to the difficulty in enforcing judgments and awards in Mexico.
II. LEGAL REMEDIES AVAILABLE IN MEXICO
Our game plan will begin by anticipating litigation. If we knew in anticipation that we were going to have to resort to a courtroom to get paid, where would we want to sue our debtor and what type of proceeding or other legal remedy should we seek as creditors?
We will have to do it in a place and in a way that will benefit us most by guaranteeing legal certainty and a strategic advantage over the debtor and over other creditors.
Knowing the types of proceedings available in Mexico and the advantages that each one of them presents will help us better asses whether to file suit directly in Mexico or turn to arbitration or litigation overseas.
The remedies that you will find in Mexico (relevant to our discussion) are the following:
I. Commercial executive proceeding. This would be the ideal scenario for a creditor if there is no possibility of creating a security interest on the debtor’s property (mortgage or pledge).
First of all, the special title document (título ejecutivo) on which the proceeding is based creates a presumption that the claim exists and that it’s legally valid, therefore, turning the burden of proof to the defendant (he basically has to probe that he paid).
Secondly, the same title gives a preliminary certitude of the plaintiff’s claims, allowing therefore, an immediate ex parte prejudgment attachment order without placing bond.
Thirdly, it is rather a summary proceeding in which evidence admission and proposals are limited to the initial stages through complaint and answer’s briefs. This makes for a shorter and faster proceeding in which a final resolution is usually going to be rendered in less time.
TIMEFRAME: Approximately one to two years to get a judgment [in a contested lawsuit]. This will depend on the venue and the amount involved.
TO FILE THIS WE NEED: A special title document (título ejecutivo) which could be a promissory note, a check or a bill of exchange.
II. Commercial “special” proceeding. This is a new regulated type of proceeding to allow a creditor to execute or foreclose on a movable asset or real property placed as collateral to secure a debt through a non-possessory pledge or a guaranty trust.
The new proceeding has made an enormous effort at last, to provide creditors for a fast and secure relief.
First, the creditor is allowed to repossess the collateral immediately after filing his complaint.
Second, if no objection is made by the debtor to account statements provided by the creditor, the court will presume that the debt exists and that it is legally valid. Also, payments made by the debtor will waive any defense based on the contracts validity (or nullity).
Third, debtors are allowed only specific limited defenses based on documentary evidence. This will limit debtor arguments in Court and will give more certainty to creditors.
TIMEFRAME: Should be a shorter proceeding than the executive. It should take around one year or less.
TO FILE THIS WE NEED: A non-possessory pledge agreement or a guaranty trust executed in writing before a Notary.
III. Civil summary proceeding. This is the mandatory proceeding to begin foreclosure on any real property serving as a mortgage.
It is a relatively short proceeding that has a track proven record of certainty and security for creditors, provided that the mortgage has been well executed and that it has priority over other encumbrances, if any.
TIMEFRAME: Approximately one to two years to begin foreclosure (in a contested lawsuit). This will also depend on the amount involved and State where the case is filed.
TO FILE THIS WE NEED: A mortgage agreement executed in writing before a Notary and filed at the Public Registry.
IV. Commercial ordinary proceedings. These proceedings accommodate for most of the cases where an international business transaction is disputed because they do not rely on a título ejecutivo and therefore, do not allow for immediate interim measures to secure proper execution of a final judgment.
Some of the most important features include the fact that it is a relatively longer proceeding and the plaintiff has the entire burden of proof to support his claim.
TIMEFRAME: From two to four years, depending on different factors: venue, amount involved, nature of our claim, supporting documents, etc.
TO FILE THIS WE NEED: Nothing; just a statement of facts. Of course, it will be difficult to probe your case under these conditions. Ideally you should account for a credit application, purchase orders, invoices, and delivery receipts.
There are two other options that must be considered before commencing proceedings in Mexico. These are:
1. Arbitration overseas and further enforcement of the arbitral award in Mexico
2. Court proceedings overseas and enforcement of the foreign judgment in Mexico
Many factors come into play when making a decision as to whether pursue legal action directly in Mexico or litigate or arbitrate overseas. These might include: 1) reliability of the specific State Courts that will hear our case [knowledgeable of international commercial disputes, corruption-free, etc.]; 2) the costs involved for filing suit, getting a judgment and executing upon debtor; 3) approximate timeframe for finishing our case and getting paid; and 4) the type of proceeding to be filed and the security that comes along with a temporary relief measure, if provided.
The options of suing abroad should be immediately discarded whenever you have real property or other collateral from the debtor as security for your debt. It is always much faster, more secure (because of interim relief measures) and less expensive to file suite directly in Mexico through a special or summary proceeding.
If you have no collateral and no promissory notes to allow you for an executive proceeding, you should be thinking arbitration or court proceedings abroad.
However, when you have a note that allows you to file for an executive proceeding, the scenario is not that clear. Ideally, you should always seek relief directly in Mexico, but should really ponder whether to follow that rule when you anticipate that sales will surpass $100,000.00 US dollars. In this case you should take a closer look at the State where your debtor is located and investigate how reliable are the Courts in that jurisdiction.
The National Banker’s Association of Mexico prepared a study which aimed at ranking Judicial Authorities of all 31 Mexican States (published in the national newspaper “El Financiero” on April 15, 2002), based on 1) professionalism, 2) quick outcomes, 3) staffing resources, and 4) the quality of actual enforcement action. The study came out as follows:
So, back to our previous question as part of the first step in our game plan: what type of suit should we look for and what jurisdiction should we choose?
Although you should seek specific legal advice for all particular situations, some general guidelines could be followed:
1. Get collateral. Try to get any type of security from your customer, either a mortgage (preferably), a non-possessory pledge, or a guaranty trust. This will allow for a summary or special proceeding, both very reliable and highly recommended.
2. Get secured. If your customer will not provide collateral as security, get him to sign a promissory note as a security guaranty. However, on accounts that will surpass more than $100,000.00 US dollars choose suing overseas when the debtor’s jurisdiction is not reliable.
3. Choose wisely. If you can’t get any security from your buyer or the account will surpass $100,000.00 US dollars and the buyer’s jurisdiction is not reliable, choose a jurisdiction overseas or arbitration. (More on enforcement of arbitration awards and foreign judgments will be discussed ahead.)
III. WHAT DO WE “ALWAYS” HAVE TO PROBE IN COURT?
Every time we sell goods to someone we are actually entering into a contract. Even if there is nothing in writing, only verbal or electronic communications, a contract is actually formed.
Therefore, every time we turn to a Court and request a Judge to compel our debtors to pay, we essentially have to probe that we have a binding contract for the sale of goods (or services), that specific terms and conditions apply, and that we met our part of the deal. (A contract is basically formed when there is an offer [for buying or selling] and an acceptance to that offer.)
Consequently, it is imperative that we ALWAYS probe the following:
1) That our buyer offered to buy some goods or that we offer to sell them;
2) That we accepted the buyer’s offer or that he accepted ours;
3) Our specific terms & conditions for the sale of goods (or services) to the buyer; and
4) Delivery of goods (or rendering of services) according to our contract (terms & conditions).
IV. HOW DO WE PROBE OUR CONTRACT AND WHAT DOCUMENTS ARE IMPORTANT TO SUPPORT THE SALE?
Our contract for the sale of goods can be probed by any kind of proof or evidence available: testimony by witnesses, depositions of parties, expert witnesses, government reports, inspections, original documents, fax, copies, emails, etc.
The important question to ask is: which evidence will be considered strong evidence which is persuasive to the Court and easier for us to provide during a case?
The answer might be already known: original signed documents.
An original signed document will probe against the defendant who signed it immediately; unless he denies the authority of the signature. On most cases, it will be easy to probe (by an expert witness) that the signature is in fact the defendant’s, and could result in the defendant’s criminal responsibility for false statements before a Court (perjury).
So, originals are still the way to go.
If you cannot get original signed forms to support your sale, you should at least try to get copies that reinforce every commitment between you and your debtor, as well as the fulfillment of your obligations.
From a litigation standpoint, it is much better to have a copy (or email printout) to which a witness can refer to and testify, than having him memorize specifics of your transaction (including terms and conditions) and have him recite them in Court. A Judge may just find him unreliable or untrustworthy.
Either way, originals or copies, it is essential that you implement and keep at least: 1) a credit application; 2) purchase orders; and 3) delivery receipts. The relationship between them is best shown in the following expression:
Let’s look at a greater detail at each one of them, as well as other documents that might come in handy.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE
(What clauses and provisions are we looking to include in our credit application)
We’ve said before that the main reason of having a credit application is to allow proper documentation of your contract terms and conditions, that is, how are you going to sell and how are disputes going to be settled.
The following are just few essential issues that your contract should cover. Your aim should be of keeping your credit application as short, plain, and simple as possible. In a short and simple way, your application should cover the following issues to your advantage:
1. GOVERNING LAW. This is a very delicate issue from a litigation standpoint. WORD OF ADVICE: YOU SHOULD NEVER INCLUDE A GOVERNING LAW CLAUSE IF YOU DON’T KNOW FIRST WHAT YOUR STRATEGY IS IN REGARDS TO JURISDICTION OR ARBITRATION. Many Courts in Mexico will interpret a governing law clause as a jurisdiction clause and you can be denied legal action in Mexico if a foreign law was selected to govern your contract.
SECOND: If you are going to include a governing law clause, CHOOSE THE LAW OF THE STATE WHERE YOU ARE SURE TO FILE SUIT. A lot of attorneys tend to include governing law from their State of practice just because they are familiar and more comfortable with said laws. Choosing a governing law should not be based on these reasons.
Important reasons could include: 1) which law gives a strategic advantage to you as a creditor; and 2) which laws will be easier to be applied by the Court that is going to hear your case.
Supposed for instance that you have chosen the law of the State of California to govern your contract but have given proper jurisdiction to Mexican Courts. The plaintiff will have to prove before the Mexican Court what does California Law provides in regards to your transaction. This will have to be done through expert witnesses or government official reports, something that will only add considerable time and expense.
So our recommendation is to seek a common ground by specifically providing for the Vienna Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (the Vienna Convention) to govern your contract.
If you want more certainty to your transaction as to an underlying law for issues not covered by the Vienna Convention, choose the law of the State that will be selected to resolve any dispute, and also try to provide for specifics terms and conditions (in your credit application) that will give you an edge on the transaction.
2. VENUE AND JURISDICTION OR ABITRATION. We have already emphasized the importance of choosing the ground for your battles. One word of CAUTION: IF YOU DO DECIDE TO GIVE JURISDICTION TO A FOREIGN COURT, MAKE SURE THAT YOU FOLLOW THE STEPS PROVIDED FOR UNDER MEXICAN LAW FOR CHOOSING JURISDICTION SO THAT YOUR CONTRACT WILL BE ENFORCEABLE IN MEXICO.
The Mexican Commercial Code provides under article 1093 that in order to choose a jurisdiction clause the parties have to give clear and express renunciation to the venue given already by Mexican Law, and also must choose between the place where any of the parties have their addresses, or the place where the obligations were to be discharged according to the contract.
Another word of CAUTION: AVOID CLAUSES THAT GIVE EXCLUSIVE OPTION OF CHOOSING VENUE AND JURISDICTION TO ONE PARTY (SELLER). This clause will be considered null and void by the Federal Code of Civil Procedure (article 567), and thus, will make a judgment unenforceable in Mexico.
Both these two words of caution will not apply to an arbitration clause and therefore, an option clause for arbitration could be used, and there will be no need to include the former statement of renunciation.
If no jurisdiction clause is chosen, Mexican case law (jurisprudencia) has established that Mexican Courts will be considered to have proper jurisdiction to hear a case out of an international commercial dispute if the defendant is located in Mexico.
3. TIMEFRAME FOR BUYER TO RAISE CLAIMS. The Vienna Convention provides under article 39 that the buyer loses the right to rely on a lack of conformity of the goods if he does not give notice to the seller within a “reasonable” time. The Mexican Commercial Code gives a buyer only five days (after delivery) to raise claims to the seller in regards to lack of quality or quantity of the goods sold.
Provide certainty to your transaction by establishing a specific timeframe for the buyer to raise claims on this regard. If he does not give you notice of these claims within that timeframe he will not be able to raise those questions in Court.
4. PAYMENT TERMS (WHEN, WHERE, HOW). You can and should provide for a general scenario on when and how will the buyer pay. The general rule should be that the buyer will pay in 30 (or 45, or 60) days upon delivery and receipt of the goods. Provide that the payment will have to be made directly to the seller through wire transfer without any need of a formal demand of payment. (Mexican Law provides for this formal demand under some scenarios. You can waive this right by expressly providing so.)
5. TOLERANCE IN SHIPMENT. Some companies sell in bulks or large production units and therefore are unable to send exact quantities as ordered by buyers. Provide that the seller will be authorized a 5% deficit or surplus in the order placed and that the buyer will be obligated to accept that 5% deficit or surplus.
6. INTEREST. Article 78 of the Vienna Convention provides that interest should be paid upon default, but gives no figures or ways of determining one. The Mexican Commercial Code provides for a 6% (annual) late interest fee. If you don’t provide specifically for one you will be only allowed to charge 6% per year.
7. REINFORCE USE OF FAX AND EMAIL. Provide that the buyer will be authorized to place orders through fax or email. This will reinforce the presumption that these mediums were common practice and a general rule.
8. NON-POSSESSORY PLEDGE. Because of the new characteristics and regulation of the non-possessory pledge in Mexico, it’s possible to establish a lien over the debtor’s movable property in generic fashion, that is, we do not have to point out specifically what assets are being encumbered.
Moreover, a pledge for transactions below 250,000 Mexican Udis (roughly $75,000.00 US dollars on December of 2003) will be valid when executed in writing, even though it is not executed before a Notary Public. This allows you to create a pledge with your credit application, and you should really take advantage of that.
V. WHAT HAPPENS WHEN I DON’T HAVE WRITTEN DOCUMENTS?
A commercial transaction that is done verbally or through the use of fax or email is a valid one. Article 78 of the Mexican Commercial Code provides that no commercial transaction will be subject to specific formalities or prerequisites for its validity.
Furthermore, recent amendments to the Commercial Code (May 2000 and August 2003) now specifically provide (under articles 89 through 114) for electronic messages and electronic signatures (along with regulation on certifying authorities) as a valid mean to create a legal and binding contract or agreement, considering such transaction as if it was executed in writing (under certain generally known conditions of authenticity and integrity).
In addition, the Vienna Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (Vienna Convention) provides under article 11 that a contract of sale needs not to be concluded or evidence in writing and is not subject to any other requirement as to form. Article 13 further provides that for the purposes of the Convention “writing” includes telegram and telex.
So, if a commercial transaction by phone, email or fax is considered valid and enforceable by law, why is it so hard to enforce in Court?
The problem lies not in the validity issue, but in our strict Legal System derived from Civil-Roman Law and in even more rigid rules on evidence procedure. Furthermore, the way in which data messages have to be conserved and presented in Court as evidence posses a great challenge not just to Mexico but to any other country.
First, evidence procedure rules on the Commercial Code provide that a private document —as opposed to a public document which is given total credit as either a public record or a document signed before a Notary Public— can only be legally recognized by the party who signed it. That means that only original signed documents by the defendant or his employees can be recognized in Court through deposition. And that’s the rationale behind requesting original signed documents all the time.
A fax or an e-mail printout sheet presented in Court by the plaintiff are documents produced by the same creditor-plaintiff, not signed by the debtor-defendant, and therefore not allowed for recognition through a deposition. The defendant will simply just object to them saying that those documents were produced by the plaintiff alone and could have been altered or falsely created.
The fax and email, although considered “writings” to satisfy a writing condition which carries authenticity, are both mediums of communication of so intangible nature that a Court will just not allow for that data to be attributable to a defendant, if objected.
Under these conditions (objection), proving by way of a fax printout alone would be impossible. Proving by way of e-mail messages would required for us to prove how the data is stored in our computer system in order to confirm integrity (that it contains all the content or text and in the way that we are asserting) and authenticity (that is real and that it was actually originated and sent by the defendant). Still, this will prove even more difficult than it sounds.
So, what happens when we lack written or originally signed documents and have only copies or email and fax printouts? The answer is simple: you provide the Court these copies and printouts and support them with reliable witnesses. Each witness will reinforce the fact that the data contained in such documents is real and that it originated from the defendant.
Mexican Courts will request at least two witnesses to prove each fact, and will give less credit to testimony from employees of the party who is offering them in Court. Despite this, full credit should be given when there are other elements supporting our claim such as fax, email printouts and other copies to which the witnesses can refer to.
With copies and proper witnesses you should be able to prove and support your claim.
Still, we cannot stress out enough the need of having at least a credit application and the delivery receipts originally signed. Besides this, everything else can be requested and kept in copies.
VI. ADDING ADDITIONAL SECURITY TO YOUR TRANSACTION THE EASY WAY
There are three documents considered in Mexico an executive title (título ejecutivo): 1) the check; 2) the letter of exchange [letra de cambio]; and 3) the promissory note [known as a pagaré in Mexico]. All these will allow for filing an executive proceeding in Mexico and thus, serve as a great security device.
However, the most important security device today is the pagaré. The bill of exchange is outmoded (not used anymore), and checks are harder to use as a security device and have a shorter life period for enforcement (six months). For that reason, we will address the pagaré as your ideal device to easily secure any credit sale.
— Promissory Note —
An ideal situation is for you to have a pagaré signed for each shipment sent and received by your buyer. Because this is very difficult to achieve in practice, you should aim at having at least one promissory note signed at the beginning of your relationship to serve as a guaranty for your future sales.
This is achieved by creating a pagaré payable “upon demand”, and then linking it to your contract (credit application) with a reference number and providing a general rule of use in said contract.
Although many customers will be reluctant to sign them, the reference to your credit application should give them security for the risk of improper use. So there is no reason why your customer should refuse to sign it.
The word of caution however is to draft your pagaré making sure it meets all requirements provided for under Mexican Law for proper enforcement.
According to article 170 of Mexico’s General Law of Commercial Paper and Credit Transactions (LCPCT), a promissory note that’s compliant with Mexican Law must contain the following:
1. The express statement that the document is a pagaré, contained within the note itself.
2. The unconditional promise to pay a certain amount of money (pagaré incondicionalmente).
3. The name of the company or individual to whom the payment is to be made.
4. The time and place where the payment is to be made.
5. The time and place where the note is subscribed (essential for the validity of the note).
6. The original signature of the issuer of the note.
The following recommendations should also not be overlooked since they could carry the nullity of the note and make it unenforceable:
1. When the issuer/debtor is a corporation, make sure that the individual signing the note has full powers to sign or issue credit instruments (títulos de crédito) on behalf of said corporation.
2. When the issuer/debtor is a corporation, make sure that the act of signing promissory notes or credit instruments is provided for specifically under its corporate purpose in the articles of incorporation.
3. Make sure that the signature is genuine and from the individual who is actually supposed to be signing the note.
4. When seeking enforcement of a promissory note, make sure that you file suit within three years of the date of maturity (statute of limitations is 3 years).
5. A co-signer (aval) is a great way to reinforce your guarantee of payment by the primary debtor. Get a co-signer.
(For further details on how to draft pagarés that will be enforceable in Mexico please visit our website at http://www.hmhlegal.com/pagaresinmexico.)
VII. OTHER VALUABLE SECURITY DEVICES AVAILABLE IN MEXICO
There are several good security devices available in Mexico today. With the recent amendments to our Commercial Code and to the Negotiable Instruments and Credit Transactions Law on May 2000 and June 2003, our government has taken colossal steps in an effort to create a modern secured financing system.
The recent amendments create a new regulation for the commercial pledge, creating in fact a new non-possessory commercial pledge, and adding valuable features not even dreamed about four years ago with traditional pledge. The amendments also addresses and regulates the guaranty trust (fideicomiso de garantía), correcting a situation of non-transfer of property rights to trustees that for years created many problems in court for creditors to the extent of making it unenforceable.
For this reason, we will only briefly address the new security devices available, as well as others which still have wide use and have proved to be valuable as well as cost-effective. Other valuable options such as the letter of credit, bonds, and insurance will not be covered on this topic.
— Non-Possessory Pledge —
The commercial pledge is a device that helps secure a loan by creating a security interest on the debtor’s personal or movable property (such as goods recently acquired out of an international sale).
For years, Mexican Law had followed traditional Roman Law principals which required that goods securing a loan be delivered to the creditor (seller). Not anymore.
Recent amendments to the Negotiable Instruments and Credit Transactions Law on May, 2000 have made it possible for lenders to retain an interest in the pledged property while debtors retain possession.
Another main feature of this new pledge is the possibility of creating a security interest in present and future collateral, as well as to secure present and future obligations. (Future collateral includes after-acquired property, account receivables, proceeds, etc.)
BEAUTY OF IT: Although not put so much to the test due to its recent regulation, we believe that the new pledge will allow for the fastest and less expensive proceeding of all. Also, you are able to create a valid pledge contract just by executing it in writing without the need of a Notary Public (for accounts worth less than 250,000 Mexican Udis, which accrued to around $75,000.00 US dollars on December 2003).
DOWNSIDE: It only creates legal effects against third parties (other creditors) upon filing at the City Public Registry. Labor and tax claims have preference and priority over a pledge.
— Guaranty Trust —
By means of a guaranty trust the debtor conveys certain assets to an institution (mostly banks) duly authorized by Federal authorities to act as a trustee, with the purpose of securing payment and priority on an obligation. The guaranty assets can be any real or personal property, tangible or intangible.
Upon default, the trustee is entitled to execute on the guaranty assets either through court or through an out-of-court foreclosure procedure in order to pay the creditor.
BEAUTY OF IT: The trustee acquires real ownership rights of the assets transferred. Therefore, there will be no labor or tax claims that will have preference or priority over your credit. It also provides for an out-of-court foreclosure procedure that is supposed to be fast and cost-effective.
DOWNSIDE: Very expensive to use on your everyday transaction. It is recommended only on sales worth $400,000.00 US dollars or more.
— Mortgage —
The mortgage agreement allows a creditor to establish a security interest in the debtor’s real property (real estate) to secure payment of any loan with priority over other creditors.
Upon default of the obligation secured, the creditor has the right to request the foreclosure of the mortgage before a judicial court and pay indebtedness with the proceeds derived from the foreclosure.
BEAUTY OF IT: It has a proven reliable procedure to foreclose on the property. Very affordable and widely known by most attorneys in Mexico.
DOWNSIDE: Has no preference or priority over labor or tax claims.
— Conditional Sale —
Through this device seller reserves title to the goods sold until buyer completes full payment. This method has proven very effective when the goods sold can be identified and can also be recorder in the City’s Public Registry of Commerce (in buyer’s place of business). Proper recording allows a seller immediate repossession of the goods sold should buyer default payment, even in bankruptcy or strike proceedings.
Highly recommended for selling heavy machinery or equipment because you get to keep ownership rights to the goods sold until paid in full.
BEAUTY OF IT: Very affordable and easy to execute. By far the least expensive of all security devices explained here. As an owner there will be no labor or tax claim that will have preference over your credit.
DOWNSIDE: You still have to file it at the City Public Registry to have legal effects against third parties, and thus, must first execute it before a Notary Public. Legal action has to be pursued through an ordinary action, unless otherwise provided through a binding arbitration or jurisdiction clause.
VIII. SHOULD WE RESORT TO ARBITRATION OR COURT PROCEEDINGS OVERSEAS?
We have already said that we should definitely resort to court proceedings overseas or arbitration when we don’t have any security for our debt. Even when we do have a promissory note as security but our debt will grow to more than $100,000.00 US dollars and the debtor’s jurisdiction is not reliable we should be thinking of this option also.
The question is which of these two options should we choose? You answer will be based on two factors: 1) the easiness and cost effectiveness of getting a quick judgment or award; and 2) the easiness, availability and cost effectiveness of enforcing such judgment or award in Mexico.
In assessing this situation we will only speak about the second factor. The first factor will have to be assessed through your local counsel overseas where you are seeking relief.
It would be a total disappointment (with the waste of time, money and effort invested) getting a judgment overseas only to figure out that it cannot and will not be enforceable in Mexico.
Therefore, the requirements and procedures for the enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitration awards will be addressed in this part. Our further recommendation for choosing either option will be assessed solely based upon this information.
— Enforcement of Foreign Judgments—
The enforcement of a foreign judgment creates great challenges for litigation attorneys. The process for enforcement goes through another parallel process called homologación, which brings recognition of full legal binding effects in Mexico to a judgment from a Court of a different jurisdiction.
As we will see, this will be a very formalistic process which will carry unenforcement if not complied with rigorously.
In regards to the enforcement of foreign judgments Mexico has signed only two Treaties: 1) The Inter-American Convention on Extraterritorial Validity of Foreign Judgments and Arbitral Awards [Montevideo]; and 2) Inter-American Convention on Jurisdiction in the International Sphere for the Extraterritorial Validity of Foreign Judgments [La Paz].
As of this date, the Montevideo Convention as really not been supported by any country but Mexico, so it is not in effect yet. The La Paz Convention has been signed by several Latin American countries only, with the absence of Canada and the United States.
Consequently, we will have to rely on Mexican Law to figure out the specific requirements and procedure for enforcement, namely, the Commercial Code and the Federal Code of Civil Procedure (FCCP).
According to article 571 of FCCP, the recognition and enforcement of a foreign judgment will take place only when the following conditions are met:
I. All formalities for letters rogatory are satisfied. According to the FCCP letters rogatory should comply with the following:
1) The letter rogatory should be certified or authenticated.
2) The documents must be legalized.
3) The documents must be translated.
4) The request must include a statement that helps satisfy the comity condition.
5) The request must include a statement that helps prove that the judgment is final.
6) Full and express powers are to be given to the requested court.
7) Counsel in Mexico should be appointed and an address must be designated.
II. Judgment is not the result of an In Rem right. (A mortgage and a pledge are In Rem rights over real and personal property.)
III. The court rendering the judgment had proper jurisdiction to try the matter and to pass judgment on it. Mexican rules on Jurisdiction should be totally complied with.
IV. Service of process has been completed upon defendant in due legal form. This “due legal form” has to be strictly compliant with Mexican Law. It can either be done according to the OAS Inter-American Convention on Letters Rogatory, or the UN Hague Convention on the Obtainment of Evidence Abroad on Civil and Commercial Cases. Either way, Mexican Procedure Law should be strictly followed.
V. The judgment must be final and have the force of res judicata. (Not subject to an appeal process for further review.)
VI. There must be no case tried by a Mexican court that is a result of the same legal actions.
VII. The judgment must not be contrary to Mexican public policy (ordre public).
Procedure for enforcement
The process for homologación can be considered a summary proceeding. This process provided for under article 574 of the FCCP, requests that parties involved are given a nine day period —after filing documents for enforcement— to defend themselves through allegations or requesting the presentation of evidence in court.
After the court has decided which evidence proposals are admitted a hearing date will be set for disclosure. Once the evidence is rendered the court will be ready to issue a judgment either granting the enforcement or denying it. An appeal process is also available to both parties for which a five day period is granted for filing.
(For additional and full information on enforcement of US judgments in Mexico please logon to our web: http://www.hmhlegal.com/enforcementofjudgments)
— Enforcement of Arbitral Awards —
The process for enforcement of an arbitral award is a rather simple one; less troublesome, less expensive and far more secure in contrast to the enforcement of a foreign judgment as explained above. That is why it should be your best option. Here’s why.
First, defenses and arguments will be limited to the debtor as Mexican Courts (according to article 1462 of the Commercial Code) will only be allowed to deny enforcement in the following cases:
I. When debtor (upon whom the execution is sought) proves to the enforcing Court that either
a) The parties in the arbitration clause (either one) had no legal capacity to enter into the contract and commit to the arbitration clause or that the contract is considered null and void by the law governing such contract or the law of the State where the award was issued (if nothing was agreed in regard to governing law);
b) No legal and proper notice was given for the appointment of an arbitrator or any of the arbitration proceedings;
c) The award deals with differences (issues) not contemplated by or exceeding within the terms of the arbitration clause;
d) The composition of the arbitral tribunal or the arbitration procedure was not done according to the parties agreement, or, failing such agreement, was not in accordance with the law of the country where the arbitration took place; or
e) The award has not yet become binding on the parties, or has been set aside or suspended by a Judicial Court of the country under the law of which that award was made.
II. When the Court finds out that the subject matter of the controversy is not capable of settlement in arbitration according to Mexican Law or when the recognition & enforcement is contrary to public policy.
Second, there is no need to comply with the formal petition requirement set forth for foreign judgments, therefore having no need of complying with strict rules on letters rogatory and no sacramental rules of procedure for service of process in Mexico. A simple formal petition (called a demanda incidental) drafted by your attorney in Mexico and signed by your legal representative, along with the requested supporting documents will be sufficient to request enforcement of an award.
Third, requirements are few and easy to comply with. Therefore, the debtor will be left with limited grounds for raising arguments in Court. The requirements are as follows.
I. Original or certified copy of the arbitration award duly authenticated (with the appropriate apostille);
II. Original or certified copy of the arbitration clause or contract that contains such clause; and
III. A full translation in Spanish language of the above referenced supporting documents.
Procedure for enforcement
The process for enforcement of an award is much the same than the one provided for judgments with one big exception: debtors have limited arguments and Courts are forced to deny any relief to the defendant based on these arguments. This alone will make your process for enforcement much easier, more secure, faster, and more reliable overall.
The process (provided for under article 360 of FCCP) can be considered a summary proceeding (incidente). It requests that parties involved are given a three day period —after filing a petition for enforcement— to contest or to request the presentation of evidence in court.
After the court has decided which evidence proposals are admitted a hearing date will be set for disclosure and to make final allegations in the following three days. Ten days are given for discovery. Once the evidence is rendered the Court must resolve within five days. An appeal process is also available to both parties and five days are granted for filing.
Because we want to limit all of debtor’s arguments in court against enforcement, whenever you are going to choose arbitration and in proceeding with this step you should always do the following:
I. Because legal capacity is one of the few allowed arguments in court, make sure that upon signing the credit application that includes the arbitration clause, the individual signing has actual legal representation for his principal. This is done by requesting a copy of the articles of incorporation (acta constitutiva) or a specific power of attorney signed before a Notary Public.
II. Another ground for unenforcement is lack of proper notice. Don’t take risks into having your award put aside because —according to the court’s criteria— the defendant was not properly served (notified). Before commencing the arbitration proceedings hire an attorney in Mexico to serve debtor personally and with the help of a Notary Public. If you cannot serve him personally, follow Mexican local procedure rules for leaving notice on his place of business or with his employees.
IX. SUMMARY GUIDELINES
Whenever you are selling goods into Mexico on credit apply the following guidelines:
1. Think strategically. If you knew that you were going to have to sue your customer, how would you want to proceed and in which jurisdiction?
2. Get secured. Based on the preceding question, choose a security device that will allow for a fast, inexpensive, and reliable proceeding in Mexico.
3. Choose wisely. If your customer will not provide security or when the amount of your transaction exceeds $100,000.00 US dollars and the debtor’s jurisdiction is not reliable, choose arbitration to resolve any dispute.
4. Leave evidence of your sale to prove your case. Always request an originally signed credit application that includes terms and conditions of sale. Also request purchase orders (at least by fax), and get delivery receipts signed (bills of lading) for each shipment.
An international credit sale presents always the risk of turning uncollectible. There are too many legal factors involved to properly collect in Court. You have to reduce that risk to a minimum.
Besides following the preceding guidelines make sure you have insight and specific advice from your local attorney overseas, as well your attorney in Mexico.
These guidelines are provided for general scenarios. You should always seek approval and advice for your specific and delicate transactions. ■
Romelio Hernandez is a litigation attorney with HMH Legal in the City of Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico. For more information about selling goods into Mexico or the process of collections and litigation in Mexico please visit www.hmhlegal.com
Calle Cuarta 1626-104, Centro
Tijuana, Baja California, México 22106
Tel.: +52 (664) 685-1387
Fax: +52 (664) 685-9196
Main Web Site: http://www.hmhlegal.com